15 Jul MICROLEARNING VS JUST IN TIME LEARNING – NEW TRAINING METHODS EXPLAINED
Looking at what’s trending in corporate training and education, two approaches have gained significant traction: Microlearning and just-in-time learning. While both methods aim to make learning more efficient and accessible, they have distinct characteristics and applications. Being able to spot the differences and similarities between microlearning and just-in-time learning can help organizations implement the most effective learning strategies for their workforce.
Microlearning: Bite-sized Knowledge Chunks
The idea of microlearning involves breaking down information into small, focused units that can be quickly consumed and easily digested. Features include:
1. Short Duration: Typically 3-5 minutes long, rarely exceeding 10 minutes.
2. Single Learning Objective: Each unit focuses on a specific concept or skill.
3. Multimedia Format: Often utilizes videos, infographics, or interactive elements.
4. Mobile-Friendly: Designed for easy access on smartphones and tablets.
5. Stand-alone Units: Can be consumed independently or as part of a larger curriculum.
Benefits of microlearning:
– Improved retention due to focused content
– Flexibility in learning schedule
– Reduced cognitive load
– Easy to update and maintain
Just-in-Time Learning: Knowledge on Demand
On another front, just-in-time learning provides immediate access to information or training at the moment of need. Characteristics of just-in-time learning include:
1. Contextual Relevance: Information is directly applicable to the task at hand.
2. Immediate Application: Learners can apply the knowledge immediately.
3. Self-Directed: Employees seek out information as needed.
4. Various Formats: Can include quick reference guides, short videos, or searchable databases.
5. Performance Support: Often integrated into work processes or tools.
Benefits of just-in-time learning:
– Reduces time spent in formal training sessions
– Enhances on-the-job performance
– Supports continuous learning culture
– Addresses real-time challenges effectively
Comparing the Approaches
While microlearning and just-in-time learning share some similarities, they serve different purposes:
1. Timing: Microlearning can be scheduled or accessed at any time, while just-in-time learning is accessed at the moment of need.
2. Content Depth: Microlearning often covers broader concepts, while just-in-time learning provides specific, task-related information.
3. Learning Curve: Microlearning builds knowledge over time, while just-in-time learning addresses immediate knowledge gaps.
4. Structure: Microlearning is often part of a structured curriculum, whereas just-in-time learning is more ad hoc.
Complementary Strategies
Many organizations find that combining microlearning and just-in-time learning creates a comprehensive learning ecosystem. For example:
– Use microlearning to build foundational knowledge
– Implement just-in-time resources for specific task support
– Create microlearning units that can also serve as just-in-time resources
Both microlearning and just-in-time learning offer valuable approaches to modern workforce education. Microlearning provides structured, bite-sized content for ongoing skill development, while just-in-time learning offers immediate, context-specific support. By understanding the strengths of each approach, organizations can develop a balanced learning strategy that enhances employee performance, engagement, and overall organizational effectiveness in today’s fast-paced business environment.