17 Dec ASK A ROBOTICS EXPERT WITNESS CONSULTANT: WHAT’S NEXT FOR ROBOTS, AI AND AUTOMATION?
A robotics expert witness consulting leader’s job is never done. As robots, AI and automated technologies continue advancing and integrating into various industries and applications, the role of the consultant has become increasingly important in the legal system. Attorneys rely on the robotics expert witness to provide specialized knowledge and informed opinions regarding cases involving robots, drones, automated machinery, artificial intelligence systems, and other complex mechanical devices and programs. There are several top types of tasks that thought leaders here are typically asked to perform by legal counsels and courts.
One common task involves having the robotics expert witness inspect mechanical evidence and provide analysis of device functionality, capabilities, and programming. For example, if an industrial accident involves an automated robotic arm, the robotics expert witness may be brought in to examine the machinery and opine whether any defects, errors, or oversight in its design or operation may have contributed to the incident. Consultants’ specialized expertise allows them to dive into the technical details and make determinations that may be critical to building or challenging a legal case.
Another typical role for the robotics expert witness is to evaluate compliance with safety regulations and industry standards. There are often strict codes and protocols surrounding the implementation and use of automated technologies and cyber-physical systems. By leveraging their knowledge of these standards, the consultant can assess whether applicable policies were adequately followed in matters relating to robotic and automation technologies. Pro findings can carry significant legal implications regarding negligence and culpability.
Providing accident reconstruction and analysis is a further service that litigating attorneys frequently solicit from robotics expert witnesses. By somehow simulating or closely examining the conditions surrounding an event, they can employ their technological proficiency to theorize on potential sequences or causes. Such reconstructive analysis can be influential in reaching legal conclusions on questionable automated system failures resulting in accidents and damage.
As automation transforms more sectors, lawyers are expected to further seek the unique technical skills and testimonies provided by robotics expert witnesses for investigating incidents, establishing adherence to policies, and informing case strategies. With robotics and AI penetrating so many aspects of human activity, the breadth and demand for this expert legal support niche will likely continue expanding for years to come.